Buy and hold investing in India

Remember the market cliché about some of the best track records coming from those of dead people’s inactive portfolios? This comes from a supposed study that was done by Fidelity, in which they noted an internal performance review on accounts to determine which type of investors received the best returns between 2003 and 2013. The customer account audit revealed that the best investors were either dead or had forgotten about their portfolios.

From Business Insider

This happens because emotions and opportunity costs are not a factor in dormant portfolios. Does that mean, one should not try to maximize returns from one’s portfolio by switching to better ideas? I don’t think that would be the perfect thing to do, considering the dormant portfolio data. I’ll tell you why. Imagine you were an investor in Wipro in Feb 2000 and somebody told you about inactive portfolios doing better than the active ones and based on that you’d decided not to sell. You’d have had 20 years of zero returns while the indices ran up multi-fold.

Very few companies survive the relentless onslaught of competition, technology, changing consumer preferences, changing government regulations and various other factors. See for example, the below list of top 50 companies by market capitalization in 1992.

Most of the above got replaced by better, sexier, smarter companies. And, most of the ones that did survive in today’s top 50, did so because of issuing new shares. Take State Bank of India for example. From a market cap of 22900 Crs in 1992 to 318,000 Crs today, SBI’s market cap grew at a pitiful 9.5% CAGR. I am not even getting into equity dilution which would chop shareholder returns down to much lower single digits.

Or take ITC, a much debated hot stock. ITC’s market cap went from 9000 Crs to 2.6 Lac Crs, delivering a return of 12% CAGR, excluding dividends. That ITC would grow at a faster clip, 2021 onward, when it is 28x bigger, and is likely to be much more bureaucratic than it was in 1992, will possibly become a case study in hope based “long-term” investing, in the future.

Going back to 1992, as investors who believed in the India growth story, and who wanted to maximize their ROI, why would we have stayed invested in SBI/ITC when there were much better fish in the pond, provided one knew where to look? Shouldn’t we have been looking for faster growing high ROE companies, than the below large caps?

Company19922021CAGR (excluding dividends,dilution,spin-offs)
State Bank of India2290531878710%
Tata Iron & Steel13793863857%
ITC912825959412%
Reliance Industries6654131061620%
HUL636954460617%
Tata Engineering & Locomotive 5287N/AN/A
Associated Cement4924N/AN/A
Century Textiles400352251%
Grasim Industries36609249512%
Tata Tea3516N/AN/A
Tata Chemicals2986189587%
Larsen & Toubro294119633916%
Gujarat State Fertilizers Company2886N/AN/A
Colgate Palmolive27664186010%
Master Shares (Unit Trust of India)2699N/AN/A
Cochin Refineries2619N/AN/A
Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India (ICICI)2475N/AN/A
Chemical and Plastics India2133N/AN/A
Hindalco21047350013%
Bajaj Auto206910417414%
Brooke Bond India2060N/AN/A
Indo Gulf Fertilizers and Chemicals Corp1814N/AN/A
Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals177944563%
Jaiprakash Industries1779N/AN/A
Shipping Credit Corporation of India1762N/AN/A
Bombay Dyeing168614680%
Essar Gujarat1683N/AN/A
Great Eastern Shipping Company166145134%
Tata Timkem153094476%
Nestle India150115977817%
Castrol India1479121668%
Century Enka1461549-3%
Indian Aluminium1452N/AN/A
Motor Industries1445N/AN/A
Britannia Industries13798441515%
Apollo Tyres1328142809%
Madura Coats1308N/AN/A
Gujarat Ambuja Cements11605855714%
Indian Rayon and Industries1144N/AN/A
National Organic Chemicals1134N/AN/A
Raymond Woollen Mills1124N/AN/A
Birla Jute Industries1120N/AN/A
Oswal Agro Mills1112132-7%
Ingersoll-Rand (India)110421162%
Mazda Industries1095N/AN/A
Siemens India10386444915%
Ashok Leyland10283348013%
VST Industries101710170%
ITC Bhadrachalam Paper1003N/AN/A
SKF Bearings (India)963107579%
Data not available for companies marked N/A

Suppose an investor forgot about his large cap portfolio in 1992, 29 years later, in 2021, he would have realized what a poor idea it was, to leave his portfolio dormant. The top performer, Reliance Industries, delivered 20% CAGR, excluding dividends, while most of the remaining companies either ceased to exist or delivered single to lower double digit returns. I am not getting into what happened to companies where data is not available. And I am not inclined to calculate dividends either because we want to look at the most efficient way of calculating returns quickly. My hunch is that, at best dividends would add 2-3% to the above returns. It is not rocket science to understand that active investors who kept learning about companies did much better than the cumulative returns delivered by this dormant portfolio, including dividends.

Conclusions

  • The answer to Buy and hold vs Buy and forget lies somewhere in between. Continue to hold companies that keep executing. For the ones that don’t, switch to better alternatives, because opportunity costs are real.
  • Buy and monitor beats Buy and hold any day. As Ian Cassel says “Fall in love with companies that execute but be prepared to divorce quickly.”
  • The above data is only for large caps. People typically invest in large caps for the certainty and clarity, the big companies provide. I agree with Ken Fisher, who once said “Clarity is almost always an illusion—a very expensive one.” As ROI focused investors we are better off investing in mid and small caps, even after adjusting for the risk involved in smaller companies.
  • Most things in the market are contextual. What works in the west doesn’t always work in India. Buy and hold may have worked in the case of Fidelity’s investors who forgot/were dead. It certainly has not worked in Indian large caps.

Barath Mukhi
30th-March-2021

Author: Barath Mukhi

Concentrated investor in Indian markets

5 thoughts on “Buy and hold investing in India”

  1. Good data points but the conclusion is a little iffy, if I may say so . Without Internet and SEBI in existence , finding out high ROE small caps in 1992, would have about 10x chances of coming a cropper . what if you had got onto Rolta
    or Satyam ? What if you had bought the global trust bank ? While if you had ITC from 2000 to till now ,you would have had a 15%(including dividends) CAGR stock .
    I think if you manage to get hold of a list of small caps like the one above , you would see more vanishing stocks . I say this because only last week my uncle pulled out his old share certificates from the 1990s and we had to burn about 23 out of 25 because all had gone bust .

    Like

    1. Based on my analysis of historical multi baggers, there are wealth creators available in every market. In most cases, what is usually not available is the hard work & the techniques needed to uncover them.

      To quote an example, Vijay Kedia was one investor (back then, probably only as good as some of us today) who made a ton of money in that era and one of his picks was Punjab Tractors https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/kolkata-man-with-a-smile-best-at-spotting-multibaggers-on-d-street/articleshow/58784177.cms?from=mdr

      Here’s how Punjab Tractors’ market cap went.
      1990 62 Crs
      1991 96 Crs
      1992 266 Crs

      Below, I quote some more:

      Satyam’s market cap
      1995 135 Crs
      1996 122 Crs
      1997 168 Crs
      1998 708 Crs
      1999 4410 Crs
      2000 24906 Crs

      Hero Honda
      1995 449 Crs
      1996 579 Crs
      1997 599 Crs
      1998 1948 Crs
      1999 3594 Crs
      2013 22790 Crs

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Fair enough and I agree that Indian markets were not mature enough to go for long hold in 90s.But dont you think if someone bought pidilite or asian paints in 2000 would he have any reason to sell ? Say you had ITC worth a lakh in 2000 you would get about 25k in dividends in 2020.Why would you sell ?
        I also dream of getting hold of a 50 bagger but at this point of time I would probably sell it at the first roadbump even if I have one(already have sold two 5 baggers in past 1 year after 60% returns ) . Having the conviction to hold stocks for long time takes experience .For all of Buffets advice he had about 20 years experience before he became famous enough to preach and even Mr. Kediya had 12 years in the market before punjab tractors. Question is ..can anyone start mature enough to spot the gold among the gilt ??

        Like

      2. Spotting the best stocks out there takes some experience & quite some work. Even after that one can’t foresee which of his/her picks will be multi baggers.

        That being said, it makes sense to follow & internalise the ideas articulated by authors like Peter Lynch, William O’Neil, Basant Maheshwari, Raamdeo Agrawal, etc. These are people whose ideas I resonate with, although I don’t agree with everything some of them say.

        In my article, I have mentioned, “Continue to hold companies that keep executing.” By executing, I mean, companies that deliver both ROE as well as above average growth rates.

        Holding Asian Paints/Pidilite would depend upon one’s opportunity costs.
        For a passive investor, the opportunity costs are lower and hence it would make sense to hold these companies.
        For an active investor looking for high CAGR, it would make sense to forego an Asian Paints/Pidilite and look for companies that go up multi-fold in a span of 3-4-5 years or thereabouts.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s